rabbit anti human cd4 antibody  (Sino Biological)

Journal: Antibody Therapeutics

Article Title: Bypassing the immunosuppressive effects of CA125/MUC16 via re-engineered rituximab (NAV-006) to improve its antitumor activity in vivo

doi: 10.1093/abt/tbaf008

Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Representative whole-body, ventral bioluminescence imaging of mice implanted with human lymphoma Raji cells expressing the reporter firefly luciferase. On day 14 after the start of treatment, tumor lesions in NAV-006-treated mice (bottom panel) are undetectable, whereas they are visible in vehicle-treated mice (top panel). Smaller lesions are detectable in some of the mice treated with rituximab (center panel). (B-C) independent studies using the same model as in (A); in both examples, the results show statistically significant antitumor activity mediated by NAV-006, while rituximab effect fails to achieve statistical significance. (D) Data from studies in (B) and (C) were pooled and statistical analysis is presented in a combined chart. One-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparison test; ns = not statistically significant; * = P < 0.05. (E) Immunohistochemistry analysis for detection of CD4-positive human lymphocytes. Spleen tissues harvested from five representative mice 28 days after the start of treatment were probed with an anti-human CD4 antibody as described in materials and methods. Three of five animals had spleens colonized by human lymphocytes even 4 weeks after PBMCs transfer. Scale bar: 200 µm.

Article Snippet: To confirm engraftment of human PBMCs in mice, we employed immunohistochemistry (IHC) using a rabbit anti-human CD4 antibody (10400-R113, Sino Biological).

Techniques: Imaging, Expressing, Luciferase, Activity Assay, Comparison, Immunohistochemistry

Journal: Immunity

Article Title: Positioning and reversible suppression of CCR7 + dendritic cells in perivascular tumor niches shape cancer immunity

doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2025.11.020

Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Heatmaps depict the enrichment of immune and non-immune cell types in the immediate neighborhood of CCR7 + DCs in NSCLC spatial transcriptomic data ( n = 4). (B) (Left) Representative FOV displaying CCR7 + DCs (HLA-DR + LAMP3 + ; yellow) located near BVs (CD31 + PDPN − ; magenta) and Tregs (CD4 + FOXP3 + ; white) in one HNSCC sample using high-plex whole-tissue imaging. Scale bar represents 20 μm. (Right) Box plots display the frequencies of BV-associated, LV-associated, and non-vessel-associated CCR7 + DCs close (<5 μm) to Tregs among all tumor CCR7 + DCs with nearby Tregs. Wilcoxon test, whiskers represent min to max; * p < 0.05. (C) Correlations between CCR7 + DCs and Tregs within CD45 + cells, as determined by scRNA-seq in multiple human cancer types. Spearman rank correlation; significant correlations are shown with a fitted red line. (D) (Left) Scheme outlining the analyses of CCR7 + DCs and Tregs in NSCLC samples. Patients with numerous (>5) CCR7 + DC clusters ( n = 12) were selected for downstream analyses. (Right) Frequency of CCR7 + DCs (CD11c + LAMP3 + ) with at least one nearby (<50 μm) Treg (CD4 + FOXP3 + ) in each individual patient. Numbers of FOVs analyzed per sample are as follows: NR01, n = 126; NR06, n = 455; NR09, n = 180; NR12, n = 79; NR26, n = 293; R11, n = 122; R15, n = 205; R35, n = 175; R37, n = 459; R45, n = 276. (E) (Left) Scheme outlining the analysis of tumor biopsies from HNSCC patients before immunotherapy (pre-IO). Patients were divided into non-responders (NR, n = 5) and responders (R, n = 5) based on the assessment of clinical response at 6 months. (Right) CCR7 + DC shortest distance to Tregs, T CONV , and CD8 + T cells in NR versus R tumors. Data are shown for all CCR7 + DCs compiled (NR tumors, n = 1,457 cells; R tumors, n = 1,324 cells). Unpaired t test, whiskers represent min to max; **** p < 0.0001. Numbers of FOVs analyzed per sample as in (D). (F) (Left) Scheme outlining the analyses of CCR7 + DC-CD8 + T cell niches. (Right) Frequencies of CCR7 + DC-CD8 + T cell niches with or without Tregs in their proximity (<100 μm). Two-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons, whiskers represent min to max; * p < 0.05. Numbers of FOVs analyzed per sample as in (D). (G) Representative FOV displaying CCR7 + DCs (FSCN1 + cells; FSCN1 in yellow) located near BVs (CD31 + LYVE-1 − cells; CD31 in magenta) and Tregs (FOXP3 + cells; FOXP3 in white) in untreated MC38 tumors. Scale bar represents 50 μm. (H) Correlations between the numbers of CCR7 + DCs and Tregs per mg of tumor tissue, as determined by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analyses of MC38 and D4M3. A tumors. Spearman rank correlation; significant correlations are shown with a fitted red line. (I) Box plots show the frequencies of tumor CCR7 + DCs close (<5 μm) to Tregs that are associated to BVs or LVs in MC38 tumors ( n = 7). Whole-tumor sections were analyzed. Paired t test, whiskers represent min to max; **** p < 0.0001. See also and .

Article Snippet: Unconjugated rabbit anti-human CD4 (Clone SP35) , Cell Marque , Cat#104R-16.

Techniques: Imaging, Fluorescence, FACS

Journal: Immunity

Article Title: Positioning and reversible suppression of CCR7 + dendritic cells in perivascular tumor niches shape cancer immunity

doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2025.11.020

Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) (Left) Scheme outlining the experimental setup for bulk RNA-seq analyses of tumor-derived CCR7 + DCs. (Right) GO pathway enrichment analyses performed on differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in CCR7 + DCs in MC38 tumors ( n = 4) from Treg-depleted ( FoxP3 -DTR) compared with Treg-sufficient (WT) mice. Bar plot indicates the −log 10 raw binomial p -values of the top 10 most enriched pathways in CCR7 + DCs. (B) (Left) Experimental setup for ex vivo stimulation of OT-I CD8 + T cells with tumor CCR7 + DCs. (Right) Percentage of OT-I CD8 + T cells that proliferated after 5-day culture with OVA 257–264 peptides-loaded CCR7 + DCs isolated from WT or Treg-depleted tumors. As a control, CCR7 + DCs without OVA 257–264 peptides were used. Two-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons, whiskers represent min to max; ** p < 0.01. (C) (Left) Relative gene expression levels analyzed by bulk RNA-seq. Each dot represents one mouse ( n = 4), whiskers represent mean to max. Unpaired t test with multiple comparisons; * p < 0.05. (Right) Representative histogram of CD40 protein expression and relative mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) measured by FACS and expressed both as normalized values and absolute MFI. Each dot represents one mouse ( n = 18), whiskers represent min to max. Unpaired t test; ** p < 0.01. (D) Analyses of cDCs in tumor-draining lymph nodes. Absolute cell counts (left, n = 10) and MFI of CD40 expression (right, n = 18) measured by FACS in migratory cDCs (CCR7 + CD8α − ) from WT or Treg-depleted mice. Whiskers represent mean to max. (E) (Left) Experimental setup for ex vivo analyses of tumor CCR7 + DCs isolated from anti-PD-1-treated mice that received or not αCD25 NIB mAbs. (Right) CD40 protein expression measured by FACS and expressed both as normalized values and absolute MFI. Each dot represents one mouse ( n = 4 WT and n = 6 FoxP3-DTR), whiskers represent min to max. Unpaired t test; ** p < 0.01. (F) (Left) Overall survival analyses of MC38 tumor-bearing mice treated, or not treated, with αPD-1 and αCD25 NIB mAbs, and in which CD4 + or CD8 + cells were depleted or not ( n = 8 or 9 mice/group). Log-rank Mantel-Cox test; * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001, and *** p < 0.0001. (Right) Percentage of tumor-free mice on day 60 in the indicated treatment groups. (G) (Left) Experimental setup for ex vivo stimulation of OT-I CD8 + T cells with tumor CCR7 + DCs as in (B). The DCs were obtained from mice receiving anti-PD-1 immunotherapy and that were treated or not with αCD25 NIB mAbs. (Right) Percentage of OT-I CD8 + T cells that proliferated after 5-day culture with OVA 257–264 peptide-loaded CCR7 + DCs. Each dot represents one mouse ( n = 8 and n = 7), whiskers represent min to max. Two-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons; * p < 0.05. (H) (Left) Scheme outlining bone marrow chimeras with inducible Cd40 -deficiency in cDCs and the treatment schedule. (Right) Growth curves of MC38 tumors inoculated in zDC iDTR : Cd40 WT and zDC iDTR : Cd40 KO bone marrow chimeras treated with αPD-1, αCD25 NIB , or αPD-1 + αCD25NIB combination ( n = 8–10 mice/group). Mean with SEM. Two-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons; * p < 0.05 and **** p < 0.0001. See also and .

Article Snippet: Unconjugated rabbit anti-human CD4 (Clone SP35) , Cell Marque , Cat#104R-16.

Techniques: RNA Sequencing, Derivative Assay, Ex Vivo, Isolation, Control, Gene Expression, Expressing, Fluorescence

Journal: Immunity

Article Title: Positioning and reversible suppression of CCR7 + dendritic cells in perivascular tumor niches shape cancer immunity

doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2025.11.020

Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Heatmaps depict the enrichment of immune and non-immune cell types in the immediate neighborhood of CCR7 + DCs in NSCLC spatial transcriptomic data ( n = 4). (B) (Left) Representative FOV displaying CCR7 + DCs (HLA-DR + LAMP3 + ; yellow) located near BVs (CD31 + PDPN − ; magenta) and Tregs (CD4 + FOXP3 + ; white) in one HNSCC sample using high-plex whole-tissue imaging. Scale bar represents 20 μm. (Right) Box plots display the frequencies of BV-associated, LV-associated, and non-vessel-associated CCR7 + DCs close (<5 μm) to Tregs among all tumor CCR7 + DCs with nearby Tregs. Wilcoxon test, whiskers represent min to max; * p < 0.05. (C) Correlations between CCR7 + DCs and Tregs within CD45 + cells, as determined by scRNA-seq in multiple human cancer types. Spearman rank correlation; significant correlations are shown with a fitted red line. (D) (Left) Scheme outlining the analyses of CCR7 + DCs and Tregs in NSCLC samples. Patients with numerous (>5) CCR7 + DC clusters ( n = 12) were selected for downstream analyses. (Right) Frequency of CCR7 + DCs (CD11c + LAMP3 + ) with at least one nearby (<50 μm) Treg (CD4 + FOXP3 + ) in each individual patient. Numbers of FOVs analyzed per sample are as follows: NR01, n = 126; NR06, n = 455; NR09, n = 180; NR12, n = 79; NR26, n = 293; R11, n = 122; R15, n = 205; R35, n = 175; R37, n = 459; R45, n = 276. (E) (Left) Scheme outlining the analysis of tumor biopsies from HNSCC patients before immunotherapy (pre-IO). Patients were divided into non-responders (NR, n = 5) and responders (R, n = 5) based on the assessment of clinical response at 6 months. (Right) CCR7 + DC shortest distance to Tregs, T CONV , and CD8 + T cells in NR versus R tumors. Data are shown for all CCR7 + DCs compiled (NR tumors, n = 1,457 cells; R tumors, n = 1,324 cells). Unpaired t test, whiskers represent min to max; **** p < 0.0001. Numbers of FOVs analyzed per sample as in (D). (F) (Left) Scheme outlining the analyses of CCR7 + DC-CD8 + T cell niches. (Right) Frequencies of CCR7 + DC-CD8 + T cell niches with or without Tregs in their proximity (<100 μm). Two-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons, whiskers represent min to max; * p < 0.05. Numbers of FOVs analyzed per sample as in (D). (G) Representative FOV displaying CCR7 + DCs (FSCN1 + cells; FSCN1 in yellow) located near BVs (CD31 + LYVE-1 − cells; CD31 in magenta) and Tregs (FOXP3 + cells; FOXP3 in white) in untreated MC38 tumors. Scale bar represents 50 μm. (H) Correlations between the numbers of CCR7 + DCs and Tregs per mg of tumor tissue, as determined by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analyses of MC38 and D4M3. A tumors. Spearman rank correlation; significant correlations are shown with a fitted red line. (I) Box plots show the frequencies of tumor CCR7 + DCs close (<5 μm) to Tregs that are associated to BVs or LVs in MC38 tumors ( n = 7). Whole-tumor sections were analyzed. Paired t test, whiskers represent min to max; **** p < 0.0001. See also and .

Article Snippet: AF647 rabbit anti-human CD4 (Clone AKYP0048) , Akoya Biosciences , Cat#S6501002.

Techniques: Imaging, Fluorescence, FACS

Journal: Immunity

Article Title: Positioning and reversible suppression of CCR7 + dendritic cells in perivascular tumor niches shape cancer immunity

doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2025.11.020

Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) (Left) Scheme outlining the experimental setup for bulk RNA-seq analyses of tumor-derived CCR7 + DCs. (Right) GO pathway enrichment analyses performed on differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in CCR7 + DCs in MC38 tumors ( n = 4) from Treg-depleted ( FoxP3 -DTR) compared with Treg-sufficient (WT) mice. Bar plot indicates the −log 10 raw binomial p -values of the top 10 most enriched pathways in CCR7 + DCs. (B) (Left) Experimental setup for ex vivo stimulation of OT-I CD8 + T cells with tumor CCR7 + DCs. (Right) Percentage of OT-I CD8 + T cells that proliferated after 5-day culture with OVA 257–264 peptides-loaded CCR7 + DCs isolated from WT or Treg-depleted tumors. As a control, CCR7 + DCs without OVA 257–264 peptides were used. Two-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons, whiskers represent min to max; ** p < 0.01. (C) (Left) Relative gene expression levels analyzed by bulk RNA-seq. Each dot represents one mouse ( n = 4), whiskers represent mean to max. Unpaired t test with multiple comparisons; * p < 0.05. (Right) Representative histogram of CD40 protein expression and relative mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) measured by FACS and expressed both as normalized values and absolute MFI. Each dot represents one mouse ( n = 18), whiskers represent min to max. Unpaired t test; ** p < 0.01. (D) Analyses of cDCs in tumor-draining lymph nodes. Absolute cell counts (left, n = 10) and MFI of CD40 expression (right, n = 18) measured by FACS in migratory cDCs (CCR7 + CD8α − ) from WT or Treg-depleted mice. Whiskers represent mean to max. (E) (Left) Experimental setup for ex vivo analyses of tumor CCR7 + DCs isolated from anti-PD-1-treated mice that received or not αCD25 NIB mAbs. (Right) CD40 protein expression measured by FACS and expressed both as normalized values and absolute MFI. Each dot represents one mouse ( n = 4 WT and n = 6 FoxP3-DTR), whiskers represent min to max. Unpaired t test; ** p < 0.01. (F) (Left) Overall survival analyses of MC38 tumor-bearing mice treated, or not treated, with αPD-1 and αCD25 NIB mAbs, and in which CD4 + or CD8 + cells were depleted or not ( n = 8 or 9 mice/group). Log-rank Mantel-Cox test; * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001, and *** p < 0.0001. (Right) Percentage of tumor-free mice on day 60 in the indicated treatment groups. (G) (Left) Experimental setup for ex vivo stimulation of OT-I CD8 + T cells with tumor CCR7 + DCs as in (B). The DCs were obtained from mice receiving anti-PD-1 immunotherapy and that were treated or not with αCD25 NIB mAbs. (Right) Percentage of OT-I CD8 + T cells that proliferated after 5-day culture with OVA 257–264 peptide-loaded CCR7 + DCs. Each dot represents one mouse ( n = 8 and n = 7), whiskers represent min to max. Two-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons; * p < 0.05. (H) (Left) Scheme outlining bone marrow chimeras with inducible Cd40 -deficiency in cDCs and the treatment schedule. (Right) Growth curves of MC38 tumors inoculated in zDC iDTR : Cd40 WT and zDC iDTR : Cd40 KO bone marrow chimeras treated with αPD-1, αCD25 NIB , or αPD-1 + αCD25NIB combination ( n = 8–10 mice/group). Mean with SEM. Two-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons; * p < 0.05 and **** p < 0.0001. See also and .

Article Snippet: AF647 rabbit anti-human CD4 (Clone AKYP0048) , Akoya Biosciences , Cat#S6501002.

Techniques: RNA Sequencing, Derivative Assay, Ex Vivo, Isolation, Control, Gene Expression, Expressing, Fluorescence

Journal: Translational Cancer Research

Article Title: Ovarian teratomas causing anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis: a case series from west China

doi: 10.21037/tcr-24-2126

Figure Lengend Snippet: Expression of CD4 and CD20 staining in different groups. (A) In the encephalitis group, CD20 positive lymphocytes infiltration into the squamous epithelium was apparent (the arrow points to the squamous epithelium). (B) In the encephalitis group, CD4 positive lymphocytes infiltration into the squamous epithelium was apparent (the arrow points to the squamous epithelium). (C) In control groups, the distribution of lymphocytes with CD4 positive was more dispersed (the arrow points to the squamous epithelium). (D) In control groups, the distribution of lymphocytes with CD20 positive was more dispersed (the arrow points to the squamous epithelium).

Article Snippet: The main antibodies (Abs) used were rabbit anti-human CD4 monoclonal antibody (dilution 1:100, Boster, China), rabbit anti-human CD20 polyclonal antibody (dilution 1:100, Boster, China), rabbit anti-human NMDAR2A antibody (dilution 1:100, Boster, China), rabbit anti-human NMDAR2B antibody (dilution 1:100, Tri-Eagle, China), rabbit anti-human NMDAR 1 antibody (dilution 1:100, Boster, China).

Techniques: Expressing, Staining, Control